Gallium Indium Phosphide Ionisation Coefficients
The figure shows the impact ionization coefficients for the IIIV tertiary semiconductor material, Gallium Indium Phosphide (GaInP), as a function of inverse electric field at room temperature. These ionization coefficients were obtained from photomultiplication measurements undertaken on a range of PIN and NIP diodes of different avalanching widths.
The electron (hole) ionization coefficients, α (β) plotted in the diagrams above can be expressed as
$$\alpha(\beta)=A\exp{\bigg[\left({\frac{B}{F}}\right)^c\bigg]}$$
where F is electric field strength. The constants A, B and c are tabulated as below.
F (kV/cm)  Coefficient Type  A (x10^{5} cm^{1})  B(x10^{5} cm^{1})  c 
3571700  α  4.57  14.10  1.73

 β  4.7.3  14.30  1.65

α(β) can be can be used in simple analytical expressions to determine the avalanche multiplication (or gain) and the breakdown voltage. In thin avalanching structures, α(β) overestimate the multiplication as they ignore "deadspace" effects. They also cannot accurately predict the excess noise due to the impact ionization process. Models to predict the multiplication and excess noise in thin avalanching structure require knowledge of enabled ionization coefficients, α*(β*).
α*(β*) can be approximated from α(β) using^{1}
$$\frac{1}{\alpha^*}=\frac{1}{\alpha}\frac{2E_{the}}{F}$$
$$\frac{1}{\beta^*}=\frac{1}{\beta}\frac{2E_{thh}}{F}$$
where E_{the} (E_{thh}) corresponds to the AlInP electron (hole) threshold energy and is given as 4.1 (4.1) eV^{2}. A full description on model which uses α*(β*) (recursive model) is given by Saleh et. al. ^{3} and the numerical equivalent model (RPL model) is by Ong et. al.^{4}
The above data is from Ghin et. al.^{5}. Details of ionisation coefficients over a wide electric field range can be found in Cheong et. al.^{1} for Aluminium Indium Phosphide and other popular semiconductor materials.
References
 J. S. Cheong, M. M. Hayat, X. Zhou and J. P. R. David, Relating the Experimental Ionization Coefficients in Semiconductors to the Nonlocal Ionization Coefficients, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 62, no. 6 (2015): 19461952.
DOI: 10.1109/TED.2015.2422789
 C. H. Tan, R. Ghin, J. P. R. David, G. J. Rees, and M. Hopkinson., The effect of dead space on gain and excess noise in In_{0.48}Ga_{0.52}As p+in+ diodes, Semiconductor Science and Technology, vol. 18, p. 803, 2003.
DOI: 10.1088/02681242/18/8/314
 M. A. Saleh, M. M. Hayat, P. P. Sotirelis, A. L. Holmes, J. C. Campbell, B. E. A. Saleh, et al., Impactionization and noise characteristics of thin IIIV avalanche photodiodes, IEEE Transactions onElectron Devices, vol. 48, pp. 27222731, 2001.
DOI: 10.1109/16.974696
 D. S. Ong, K. F. Li, G. J. Rees, J. P. R. David, and P. N. Robson, A simple model to determine multiplication and noise in avalanche photodiodes, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 83, pp. 34263428, 1998.
DOI: 10.1063/1.367111
 R. Ghin, J. P. R. David, S. A. Plimmer, M. Hopkinson, G. J. Rees, D. C. Herbert, et al, Avalanche multiplication and breakdown in Ga_{0.52}In_{0.48}P diodes, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 45, pp. 20962101, 1998.
DOI: 10.1109/16.725241
